Monday, October 30, 2006

Lost on the Web; search on Live.com

I apparently seem to be marketing Live.com;
Am I? Yes.
Am I a marketing agent? No.
Do I have a network? Yes, I do.
Well! i am a common man, and it is possible for me to spread my feelings, thoughts and ideas to a lot of people. Its all because of web (aka internet). Now a days even a school kid has a global presence.
I have got a lot of power, though i am lost. I am lost amongst a lot of people, my thoughts are lost in the sea of thoughts,ideas.

Welcome to the small world with a lot of people!
Welcome to the named anonymity!

Do we realize, what have we lost here? I have a tons of online friends, but how many have i meet? Probably a few of them.
Do i go to social gatherings often? Not much.
Or do i prefer chatting with them rather than going over and meeting? Yes, its true.

The style of the society has changed, i have lost the closeness;there are many links in the social network, but they are sparse.
Its good that we are in touch with a lot of people, but it is required to meet them.

Do I see a lot of kids playing in the grounds nearby? Yes, but only a few.
Kids now a days preffer to stay inside house and play computer games, chat, the physical self is lost.

There are much more to be seen around outside the web, you cant find them at Live.com.
So, try not to Live at .com but only find stuff at Live.com ;)

Friday, October 27, 2006

Human think tank

Not an enemy-Line, not a border, not a wall, not a line of control.

It’s not about two countries; not about neighbors. It’s about me; a single entity, divided into multi think units, grudging against others.

The tussle hides the singularity of this single functional unit. Me, my decisions are neither driven by any principle, nor do they follow any pattern. The ideas and decisions are an outcome of either one or a group of these think units. The outcome is just functions of speed and size of the think group.The description above forms the basis of the fuzzy logic, for which the human brain is known for.

All's good till now, but then the question arising out of it is how we get a consistent and correct decision out of this system. Let me talk about the correctness first.

1> The requirement of correctness is it self not true in the absolute sense. Correctness as a concept is relative and varies depending on the facts seen and seemingly true. All relies on a system of beliefs, which in turn varies from human to human. Well this differentiates human from a machine.

2> Now coming on to consistency; Consistency is achieved by training the think system. Our system attaches a weight value to each think unit. And the highly weighted think units are the ones that drive the outcome.

The consistency can also be called as selective filtering of think units. A new born carries a default genetic filter, but the functional filter is a modified copy of the default filter. The functional filter is the one developed by training the think system over the life time.Generally these filter trainings are gradual and slow but the functional filer may go under drastic change (modification / deletion) when there are shock conditions.